IZBR
Hi! My name is Isaac Basque-Rice, I'm A Security Engineer and former Abertay Ethical Hacker, and this website is a repository for all the cool stuff I've done, enjoy!
Project maintained by IBRice101
Hosted on GitHub Pages — Theme by mattgraham
Scientific Paper Notes
This page comprises the notes I have taken from a number of resources (linked intermittently) on how to read scientific papers, and producing a literature review
If you find this helpful, please consider getting me a meal deal :)
How to Read a Scientific Paper Efficiently
Notes taken from this video by Prof. Pete Carr of the University of Minnesota.
- DO NOT READ THE PAPER IN ORDER
- Structure of a Scientific Article:
- (1) Title
- (2) Keywords
- (3) Abstract
- (5) Intro
- (7) Experiment/Methodology
- (6) Results and Discussion
- (4) Summary/Conclusions
- (8) References
- An algorithm for reading a paper
- Feel free to stop reading at any point if there is no interest in the paper
- Three-Phase algorithm (he says two but its really three lmao)
- Phase 1 - Survey the Paper
- Read the title and keywords
- Read the abstract
- Jump to conclusions
- If the conclusions are irrelevant there’s no point continuing
- Phase 2 - Read the paper
- Look at tables, figures, and captions
- This is what was done in the work
- Doesn’t take much time
- Getting into details will slow down the reading
- Read the introduction
- Provides with background information
- Read the results and discussion
- The heart of the paper
- Will take most time
- Read the experiment
- How the work was conducted
- Only need to read this if you’re really interested & need to understand what was done to understand the meaning
- Phase 3 - Notes
- When done, you can stop
- Note taking is a good idea so you don’t have to read the whole thing again
- Lets you know at a glance what papers you need and do not need
- The faintest writing is better than the best memory
How to Write a Literature Review in 30 Minutes or Less
Notes taken from this video by David Taylor as well as the accompanying website
- Lit review is just a report (Don’t let it scare you!)
- Is 5 steps
- Step 1: Extract Summaries
- Write a paragraph from the notes collected in the previous section
- Separate them into paragraphs and citations
- In-Text citation at the beginning of each paragraph
- Author’s last name outside of parentheses
- Refer back to the source (“the authors present…”)
- Year of publication only needs to be referred to once, in the in-text citation
- Step 2: Reorder Summaries
- Reread all summaries carefully
- Find similarities and difference
- Reorder paragraphs into a logical list
- No single correct way to rearrange paragraphs
- Cause-Effect
- Problem-Solution
- Series of Advances
- Myths-Realities
- Ancient-Modern
- Effective-Ineffective
- Label each paragraph with a high-level overview such as the ones above
- Step 3: Divide Into Body Paragraphs
- Combine or divide paragraphs (if necessary)
- Based on two factors:
- Factor 1: How closely related the summaries are
- If the high-level overview is the same for paragraph A and B, combine them
- If not, keep them separate
- Also combine if the two paragraphs talk about something you can relate (geography etc.)
- Factor 2: How long will the paragraph be?
- Try to limit to 10-14 lines
- Step 4: Shape the Paragraphs
- Add topic sentences and transitions
- Turn the summary paragraphs into real paragraphs
- e.g., “as far back as 2006, XYZ stated that…”
- If more than one sentence in a paragraph, new sentence or “thought bridge” must be added between them
- First add topic sentence, e.g., “the call to action was headed by researchers who began to study Topic X…”
- Then add thought bridge, e.g., “XYZ’s findings were replicated in ABC’s (yyyy) study, which concerned Topic Y”
- Step 5: Add Introduction and Conclusion
- Introduction:
- Do as normal
- Use a sentence such as “the following literature review…”, signals to the user that it’s not your personal opinion, claim, or argument
- Conclusion:
- Open conclusion with a restatement of the thesis, brings the user back to the overall point
- Common ending is to comment on any gaps or flaws in the research reviewed